Under preparation!
In this chapter I will not try to find a way how living matter can arise from inanimate matter. But I will try to find a way in which the designed atomic structures can contribute to the processes taking place in living organisms. Since the quantum approximation cannot explain the chemical and physical properties of elements, it cannot explain the role these elements play in living organisms. It will be interesting to see what PIV theory can do. It is a well-known fact that the basic elements of living organisms are C, N, and O. It is a well-known fact that the basic elements of living organisms are C, N, and O. In this, the most common isotopes are not prevented by an additional neutron, such as in the case of Li, Be or B. One of the most important processes in living organisms is the transmission of information, e.g. via nerve fibers. That information would be the movement of electrons, which could take place on a path created by the overlap of electron orbitals from the C, N, and O atoms. This orbital is likely to be formed mainly by double bond orbitals because they have a longer range. Another disadvantage of simple links is that they can rotate, breaking the connection, which is not desirable. Another option is to use electron orbitals of non-bonding electron pairs, which will be anchored in the organic structure by hydrogen bonds. The entire path should be as rigid as possible, but must still allow tissue movement without breaking the connection. Next, we will analyze the options of individual elements. 3D models of designs of basic atomic configurations can be found in the chapter “Configuration of 3D atomic nuclei”
Oxygen
An oxygen atom has a total of three proton-electron pairs. The basic advantage of the oxygen atom is that neither pair is split by any other pulse, and thus the electrons can move freely throughout the orbital in all three cases. The most reactive pair can form a double bond, thereby creating a rigid connection that can itself participate in nerve transmission. One of the less reactive oxygen pairs can form a hydrogen bond, which strengthens the entire structure and can also participate in nerve transmission.
Nitrogen
In its basic configuration, the nitrogen atom contains one reactive proton-electron pair, which in organisms mostly forms the NH2 group. The disadvantage of NH2 bonds is that they are two single bonds that can rotate independently, which would interrupt signal transmission. Furthermore, one less reactive proton-electron pair, which forms hydrogen bridges and can thus participate in nerve transmission. Another is the unpaired deuterium unit, which in its basic, most favorable, position is oriented perpendicular to both proton-electron pairs. This splits their orbitals and blocks the transfer. But here too, there is a possible solution. If this unpaired proton is used to form a chemical bond with the tissue structure, then the NH2 molecule will partially rotate around this single bond and be fixed in the appropriate position by a hydrogen bond, canceling the splitting of the proton-electron pair orbitals, which will allow signal transmission.
Figure 52. Probable configuration of the amino group in living organisms
Carbon
In its ground state, carbon contains two proton-electron pair units that split each other’s orbitals by neutron pulsation. But, similar to nitrogen, one of the deuterium pairs can be rotated to an alternative position, preventing the other pair from being split by the neutron pulsation and allowing it to participate in the transfer of information. Such a configuration is shown in the following 3D model.
Figure 53. 3D model of carbon in semi-open configuration
A possible double bond with oxygen would then look like this.
Figure 54. C=O bond capable of transmitting signal.
Unlike Figure 44, here the double bond between C and O is not spit by neutron pulses and electrons are free to move throughout the orbital as much as possible. This double bond may be part of the signal transmission. In contrast to Figure 44, here the double bond between C and O is not split by neutron pulses and the electrons are free to move around the entire orbital within their capabilities. This double bond may be part of the signal transmission.
In the previous text, I suggested how it would be possible to transmit a signal in living organisms by creating an electron path using the overlap of open orbitals of double bonds and non-bonding electron pairs. However, just as every electrical line should contain a switch that can be used to turn the signal on or off, it is likely that living organisms will also have a mechanism to enable or block signal transmission. A carbon atom can be used as just such a switch. If we use one bond in the open configuration to anchor the position of the carbon in the tissue, we can use the second bond to operate the switch. Theoretically, it is possible to prepare various control mechanisms sensitive to various stimuli, such as temperature, pressure, etc. When the passage is closed, the configuration of the carbon atom could look like the following image.
Figure 55. 3D model of carbon blocking the passage of the signal
A possible double bond with oxygen split by neutron pulses would then look like this.
Figure 56. C=O bond blocking signal transmission.
If organisms have acquired the ability to control the configuration of carbon, this opens up enormous possibilities for further development. Timers can be created that control biorhythms. Similar to computers, memories and processors can be created. In quantum approximation terminology, this would be a quantum computer, because individual configurations of atoms are nothing more than what quantum approximation refers to as quantum states. Of course, this is just a hypothesis and living organisms have found other possibilities. But it is a hypothesis with a certain reasonable probability. And with each new such hypothesis, the origin of life seems less mysterious after all. From the above requirements it follows that the exact configuration of each atom and each bond matters. And although from a chemical point of view they may be the same molecule, from a biological point of view they may have completely different biological activities. And that was also the reason why I introduced the term biochirality in the chapter “Configuration of 3D atomic nuclei”
My next goal is to assemble known organic models, e.g. proteins up to their tertiary structure using designed atomic models, to search for created electron pathways, switches and mechanisms for controlling these switches. I believe that this will help uncover many of the still unexplained mysteries of organisms.