Skip to content

Weight and gravity

We can imagine gravity as a space with a different density of pulses. Weight and gravity are connected vessels. For particles, this connection is even more apparent. For an object, the resultant gravitational force is the vector sum of all the interactions acting on it. A particle creates “gravity” by its own pulsation. Since we do not measure the mass of a pulsating particle directly, but derive it based on its interaction with its surroundings, which is also the case with a classical balance and conversion via gravitational acceleration, it is very difficult to say whether we have measured the real mass of the particle or only its apparent mass. For example, if we take a proton and a neutron, we create deuterium, whose mass is less than the sum of the masses of both particles. According to current theory, the “lost” mass during a nuclear reaction has been converted into energy. But it is also possible that the overall intensity of deuterium’s pulsation has only decreased, and thus its ability to interact with its surroundings.  The following table shows the relative differences between the theoretical and measured masses of the elements.

(https://www.sisweb.com/referenc/source/exactmas.htm)

*  Atoms with one supplemental neutron

Table 2. Mass losses for individual atoms

The table shows how the relative mass of atoms changes after adding hydrogen (proton and electron) or neutron. One of the most important is the value for 4He, because 4He is a kind of imaginary idol with an optimal arrangement of atomic particles. On the one hand, it is assumed to be the main product of the nuclear fusion of the sun, and on the other hand, it is the basic building block of 3D atoms. The relative mass loss for 4He is 0.753%. We can assume that this value does not change significantly for 3D atoms. Therefore, it is more interesting to compare how the relative mass of atoms changes after subtracting the measured mass of 4He, as shown in the table. It is certainly interesting to compare the relative losses for 3H and 7Li atoms, where 7Li is essentially 3H enclosed in a 4He plane. In the case of radioactive 3H, where the particles can rotate around each other to some extent, the loss is 0.301%. For 7Li, where the particles are separated by a partition, it is 0.385%. The 4He plateau appears to have a significant stabilizing effect. To compare the relative mass loss between 3D atoms, the presence of an additional neutron must be taken into account, which probably slightly reduces the resulting value. The value for 12C is certainly also interesting, as it not only surpasses the value of 4He, but is also very close to the maximum value for 20NE, which is the same as in the case of 16O. It seems that arranging protons and neutrons into two eight-membered rings is even more advantageous than creating a 4He ring. But it should be taken into account that for the calculations we neglected the effect of the 4He plateau on the overall atom.

The more intense the pulsation, the heavier the particle appears. The intensity of the particle’s pulsation depends on its size, but also on the environment in which it is located. Therefore, nucleons in different atomic nuclei have different masses. The pulsation of a particle is affected by the presence of other particles, both by the intensity and direction of their pulses, but also by direct contact.  Higher gravity slows down the intensity of the particle’s pulsation. In order for a particle to achieve the same intensity of pulsation, and therefore the same mass, it needs to increase its internal energy. It means that particles in a really high gravitational field, such as stars, can have much higher internal energy than particles in a low gravitational field, such as on earth. It is therefore possible that the more, for example, the sun, loses its energy, and therefore also its mass and thus also its gravity, the more the energy stored in the particles is released. If we return to the short lifetime of the neutron outside the atomic nucleus, as mentioned at the beginning of the article, then the small gravity is responsible for this short lifetime in terrestrial conditions.

If we were to move a molecule in this imaginary system towards an object with really high gravity, such as a black hole, then the protons and neutrons in the atomic nuclei would react by reducing the intensity of their pulses and the electron orbitals would move closer to the protons. First, there would be the cancellation of chemical bonds in the molecule and the disintegration into individual atoms. At some point, the innermost electrons would fuse with the protons to form neutrons. This would cause the atomic nuclei themselves to disintegrate. By the opposite process, if the neutron were moving away from the black hole, at some distance it would become unstable and form a hydrogen atom. At the same time, as it reaches a space with lower gravity, it releases its internal energy and transforms it into thermal energy.